So, you're seriously going to write him off, because he sided with Veidt? Even after years of working together? [Or, sort of working together. And while Daniel hadn't backed Rorschach in wanting to expose everyone, Dick didn't really see that as a betrayal, which admittedly, could come from the fact that he was an outside observer and wasn't there when it happened. He didn't have the same emotional involvement as Rorschach.
He might not have made the same choice himself, but honestly he hoped he would never have to. And if he was really being honest here, part of him kind of thought if he ever was, he probably would have done what Nite-Owl did.]
I know Veidt's a monster, and what he did is totally inexcusable, but I can understand why someone like Dan would decide to keep quiet for now. I'd never agree with Veidt or condone what he did, and I'd definitely watch him like a hawk for the rest of his life, but. "The good of the many outweighs the needs of the few"?
[Don't judge him, Tim has made him sit through at least one Star Trek movie (which is weird now that he's bros with Kirk, but).]
What do you think would happen, if the truth was exposed?
[Spam]
He might not have made the same choice himself, but honestly he hoped he would never have to. And if he was really being honest here, part of him kind of thought if he ever was, he probably would have done what Nite-Owl did.]
I know Veidt's a monster, and what he did is totally inexcusable, but I can understand why someone like Dan would decide to keep quiet for now. I'd never agree with Veidt or condone what he did, and I'd definitely watch him like a hawk for the rest of his life, but. "The good of the many outweighs the needs of the few"?
[Don't judge him, Tim has made him sit through at least one Star Trek movie (which is weird now that he's bros with Kirk, but).]
What do you think would happen, if the truth was exposed?